En Español

Very usefull links





Business Partners





FxHQ Forex News

The Global Barrel

Tiempo Cultural

Gustavo Coronel

Iran Watch.org

Le Blog des
Energies Nouvelles

News Links




Dow Jones

Oil price



Views and News




Inside, confidential and off the record



Guyana refinery controversy

  Who advised the advisor that Guyana needs a 100,000 bpd refinery?


The question is, where the crude oil out the starbrook block should be refine? Trinidad wants to refine it, the use of a FPSO looks make sense, ExxonMobil has not definitely put forward a recommendation, a refinery in Guyana is another possibility.

This past week a expert Mr Pedro Hass from Hartree Partners recommended no refinery for Guyana.

But an important issue has not been clarify, what dimension of refinery we are talking about? 100 mbd, or 300 mbd +, there is a lot of differences in an economy of scales.

Bellow a letter to editor of stabroeknews.com by Sase Singh questioning Mr. Hass reconmmendation.

Dear Editor;

Wasn't Hatree Partners, founded by the Hess Corporation?  Is the Hess Corporation a 30% stakeholder in the ExxonMobil project? Aren't the foreign operators looking at the Guyanese oil as a source of raw oil to fill their own internal refining capacity gaps?  So why should one of their related parties recommend otherwise vis-à-vis a new Guyanese oil refinery? This is the million-dollar question.  Is this advice from Mr Hass genuine?

It is just absurd that a consultant would proclaim that the cost to construct such a facility would be some US$5 billion.  Who advised the advisor that Guyana needs a 100,000 bpd refinery? Let the record show that Guyana needs a 30,000 bpd refinery similar to that of Suriname with its 20,000 bpd (barrel per day) refinery. The new technologies allow for modularly built refineries. There is always the possibility for expansion incrementally if the need arises.  Such a refinery with the ancillary facilities is more likely to cost about US$2 billion (US$0.7 billion for the refinery and the rest for the ancillary services).  So it was extremely discomforting to listen to the recommendations made by this consultant by way of the podcast on DemeraraWaves. Thanks to Dennis Chabrol; he should keep up the good work.

The way the deal is structured is that if the wells produce approximately 100,000 bpd, then ExxonMobil will discount the daily depreciation cost for the original investment and the daily cost of running the operations.  Let us assume for discussion's sake that at an average selling price of US$55 per barrel, that computes to 40,000 bpd in value.  That would leave 60,000 bpd to be distributed between the investors and Guyana ? 50/50.  In such a scenario, the contract entitles Guyana to 30,000 bpd.  That is our only concern what to do with the 30,000 barrels of oil every day.  The other 70,000 is ExxonMobil's business and none of Guyana's business.

Thus this recommendation by Hartree Partners and Mr Pedro Hass should be surgically scrutinized on multiple grounds. It fails to appropriately consider the merits of the oil deal; it does not take into consideration Guyana's vested political and economic interest and most importantly, it is a one-sided suggestion that clearly shows bias towards the foreign operators.  Is the game rigged against Guyana?

I must acknowledge the excellent push back from Minister Trotman; he did his job.  He did not roll over on the recommendations, he hit the nail on the head by saying the final decision will be political.  This is not an exclusive economic decision, but one also grounded in national development and our need to industrialize.  In this day and age when refineries are active for more than 90 years, then this investment is very suitable for the long term investors like the international pension plans.

Their only mandate is steady and long-term payback.  Everyone will win if an oil refinery is built in Guyana: the workers, the local private sector, the international long-term investors and the government and people of Guyana.

Yours faithfully,

Sase Singh

stabroeknews.com / May 20, 2017.

This article was shared with Demerara Waves Online News by Caribbean Intelligence

Link to the original article.

ISSUES.... 05/22/ 2017 - Send Us Your Issues

Inside, confidential and off the record

Is an independent journalist effort from Petroleumworld, on Inside, Confidential and Off The Record Information, its views are not necessarily those of Petroleumworld

Follow us in : twitter / Facebook

Send this story to a friend Copyright© 1999-2017. Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.

We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors.
Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.

Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments, share your thoughts on this article, your feed. back is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com


By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.

Any question or suggestions,
please write to: editor@petroleumworld.com

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8 +/ 800x600 pixels




Editor & Publisher:Paul Ohep F./Contact Email: editor@petroleumworld.com


CopyRight © 1999-2016, Paul Ohep F.- All Rights Reserved. Legal Information

PW in Top 100 Energy Sites

Technorati Profile

CopyRight © 1999-2016, Paul Ohep F. - All Rights Reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, posted online, rewritten or redistributed by any type of means, except with permission of the author/s

The information in this web site is proprietary and is protected under United States and International Copyright and Trademark laws. No part of this web site may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means whatsoever, except with permission of the author/s..

Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Any use of this site or its material, in any form, without the express prior written consent of the author, is prohibited by law and is subject to legal action. Legal Information

Top 100+

Technorati Profile
Fair use notice of copyrighted material:

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from Petroleumworld or
the copyright owner of the material.