World


Venezuela


Mexico

Brazil


Bolivia


Peru

Trinidad &
Caribbean










Very usefull links





BOOKSTORE

 


PW in Top 100
Energy Sites




 

ISSUES....
Inside, confidential and off the record

 

Saudi move

 

The decision to migrate the Saudi crude oil price formulas from Platts' WTI benchmark to Argus' Americas Sour crude Index (ASCI) was a logical step that has been well documented in the press.

While ESAI agrees that this development will have little short term impact on the WTI benchmark, there will undoubtedly be wider implications for crude oil pricing in the long term. In a note to clients last week, ESAI laid out the sequence of events that might eventually lessen the impact of paper trade on oil pricing.

It is likely that Saudi Arabia (with one million b/d of exports to U.S. so far this year) will not be the last major sour crude exporter to shift to the ASCI. Iraq (450,000 b/d), Kuwait (200,000 b/d), and the UAE (125,000 b/d) could make similar changes in the coming months.

It is also possible that Pemex (1.1 million b/d) and PdVSA (1.2 million b/d) could move toward the ASCI or at least the ASCI-Maya spread would be followed more closely. These changes would mean a significant volume of physical crude could be priced off of ASCI.

Although the ASCI price is based on differentials of its component crudes to WTI, this development does create more of an arm's length relationship between sour crude pricing and WTI. Most importantly, if more countries follow, the quality differential between WTI and imported sour crude will be shaped more by USGC fundamentals and less by sometimes arbitrary government price formulas. This will also raise the profile of Mars and Poseidon, the two major components of the ASCI contract.

Another important development is the announcement that CME (NYMEX) will create one or two futures contracts tied to the ASCI price or one of the sour crudes. While NYMEX's earlier USGC sour futures contract failed, the potential for much more physical sour crude tied to a specific USGC quotation like ASCI could help the success of a new contract.

CME has indicated that the first contract will only have cash settlement but a successor contract could also allow physical delivery.

The development of a futures contract begs the question of whether ASCI (or its component crudes) could ever become spot market benchmarks, traded on their own right, and not as simple differentials to WTI. That seems unlikely today, but even if there is no crude price that could ever be completely divorced from either WTI or Brent, the growth in physical trade tied to this marker and the existence of a futures contract to facilitate hedging could gradually move USGC sour crude pricing in that direction.

If that did happen, then we could see a gradual reduction in the financial influence on crude pricing. WTI would be the American benchmark more shaped by the dollar and other capital market developments and ASCI (or the like) would be the American benchmark more shaped by developments in sour crude oil supply.

The spread between the two would indicate more than just the geographic and quality differences between them. Moreover, even if financial trade moves to a USGC sour crude futures contract, the ability to deliver seaborne crude on the contract would give the physical market more power to discipline a paper rally than WTI at Cushing allows today.

Finally, by not pricing directly off WTI, the sour crude exporters of OPEC can say that their production decisions are not directly influencing WTI, but rather sour crude pricing, giving them some cover when and if WTI prices on NYMEX take off.

Obviously this scenario would take a long time to unfold and would require many things to happen in sequence, but it would certainly make us look back on this Saudi decision as a very important development.

 

ESAI, Energy Security Analysis Inc, is a Massachusetts-based energy consultancy.( skanlier@esai.com) / Nov 11 / Reuters

 


ISSUES.... 11/18/09

ISSUES.... Inside, confidential and off the record

Is an independent journalist effort from Petroleumworld, on Inside, Confidential and Off The Record Information, its views are not necessarily those of Petroleumworld - Send Us Your Issues

Legal information: Copyright/Disclaimer

Copyright© 2008 respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.

We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors.

Send this story to a friend

Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

Any question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com




Best Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels

 


Contact:editor@petroleumworld.com/phones:(58 412) 996 3730 or 952 5301
www.petroleumworld.com-Editor:Elio Ohep /
Publisher-Producer:Elio Ohep.
Contact Email:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Legal
Information. CopyRight © 2002, Elio Ohep.- All rights reserved

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.