Lagniappe
Crisis
Group:Colombia:
Making military progress pay off
OVERVIEW
Almost
six years of intense security operations against the Revolutionary
Armed
Forces of Colombia (FARC) by the administration of President Álvaro
Uribe are beginning to produce tangible results. Government forces
killed several important rebel field commanders in 2007 and two members
of the central command in March 2008, including second-in-command
Rául Reyes, and have severely disrupted insurgent communications,
prompting a loss of internal cohesion and decreasing illegal revenues.
However, this progress has come at the cost of severely deteriorating
relations with Ecuador and Venezuela and increased risk of political
isolation after the controversial bombing raid on Reyes’s camp
inside Ecuador. Military gains can pay off only if combined with
a political strategy that consistently pursues a swap of imprisoned
insurgents for hostages in FARC captivity, reestablishes much needed
working relations with neighbours along borders and strongly advances
integrated rural development to consolidate security and broaden
Colombia’s international support.
Achieving
the hostages-for-prisoners swap is a key challenge for the Uribe
administration.
The issue has acquired great political
significance in Colombia and internationally since mid-2007 and has
contributed to increasing tensions with Venezuela. After an initial
initiative of French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who seeks the liberation
of Colombian-French citizen Ingrid Betancourt, and Uribe’s
unilateral release of some 180 FARC prisoners in May 2007, the government
authorised Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez in August 2007
to facilitate a swap. Uribe officially sought to end Chávez’s
involvement three months later, however, in the absence of results
and following an open display of bias towards the FARC. The FARC
unilaterally released six hostages in January and February 2008 (of
a total of some 45 so-called “political” and another
700 “economic” hostages, with the latter not being considered
part of any deal at this point) as a gesture of support for Chávez.
This did nothing to advance a deal, however, despite the support
of a group of friendly countries, among them France and Brazil.
The
1 March attack on the FARC camp in Ecuador that produced Reyes’s
death triggered the most serious political crisis in the Andean region
in many years, Colombia’s condemnation in the Organization
of American States (OAS) and the Río Group and a break in
relations with Ecuador. It also seemed to slam the door shut to further
unilateral releases of hostages and a humanitarian agreement. The
insurgents insist on and Uribe rejects the demilitarisation of two
municipalities. Meanwhile, there is evidence that the FARC is adapting
its method of operation and long-term strategy and, as in the past,
may well survive the recent government military escalation. Its ability
to use Venezuelan and Ecuadorian sanctuaries presents a major challenge
for Uribe’s security policy.
The Uribe administration should not put all its eggs in the military
basket. It needs to promptly design and implement a complementary
strategy that would allow it to gain political ground on the insurgents
as well as recover broader international backing, especially regionally.
Moving forward with the hostages-for-prisoners swap is crucial. The
strategy should focus on:
-
devising strongly conditioned political incentives to advance the
hostages-for-prisoners
swap with the FARC, including either internationally monitored
demilitarisation
of Florida and Pradera municipalities or another area of similar
size that would serve as the site of negotiations for 45 days on
the basis of a prior agreement with the FARC that the hostages and
prisoners would be released during that period;
-
engaging Ecuador immediately and Venezuela subsequently in order
to reinforce
border cooperation
and prevent the use of sanctuaries,
including by enhancing the communications and helicopter mobility
of the new OAS monitoring mechanism;
-
redesigning the role of the group of friendly countries by giving
it a limited
mandate specifically for the hostages-for-prisoners
swap and calling on Brazil to assume a leadership role;
-
and expanding considerably investment in infrastructure for rural
development
so that economic alternatives to coca cultivation,
better governance
and rule of law can provide the basis for sustainable security
in territory freed from the FARC.
The International Crisis Group (Crisis
Group) is an independent, non-profit, non-governmental organisation covering
some 60 crisis-affected
countries and territories across four continents, working through
field-based analysis and high-level advocacy to prevent and resolve
deadly conflict. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
Note: This commentary was originally published by crisis
group.org,
on 04/29/2007 (Bogotá/Brussels ). Contacts:
Andrew Stroehlein (Brussels) +32 (0) 2 541 1635Kimberly Abbott
(Washington) +1 202 785 1601. Petroleumworld reprint
this article in the interest of our readers. For
a full the report: http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=5410&l=1. All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect
either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment
as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are
private
comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website.
All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of
which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to
advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian
significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld
has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article
nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original
source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within
the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your
comments on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 05/14/08
Copyright© 2008
respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories
by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other
stories you have to get authorization by its authors.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels