Editorial
Commentary
Oliver
L Campbell :
New Venezuelan tax
on the extraordinary
profits of oil companies
The
new windfall tax has had its first reading in the National Assembly.
Its name is “Tax on Extraordinary Profits of Venezuelan Oil Companies” (Impuesto
a las Ganancias Extraordinarias Petroleras Venezolanas). This is a misnomer
since the tax is not on extraordinary profits but on extraordinary sales
income. Profits imply revenues less costs, but this tax only looks at income
from export sales.
The previous names
of “sudden profits” and “excessive
profits” have been dropped in favour of “extraordinary profits” but,
to all intents and purposes, it is a windfall tax. The National Assembly
has come up with a system that is reasonably fair and not too difficult
to apply. The computation takes no account of the fact that the oil companies
have disparate incomes and disparate costs. Light crudes are worth more
than heavy crudes, and production costs can vary from around $5 a barrel
to $15 a barrel. The latter applies to production from the Orinoco Oil
Belt and includes the cost of upgrading to make the extra-heavy crude,
of some 8.5º API, into a viable one.
The Venezuelan government
is not known for consulting with the affected parties before passing
new tax legislation, and any disaffected oil companies
are unlikely to make any public statements for fear they may be asked to
leave for questioning the country’s “sovereignty.” Unlike,
say, the UK and USA, where the oil companies would certainly criticise
any proposed legislation they did not agree with, this recourse, or “derecho
de pataleo” is not common in Venezuela.
It is worth noting that the new tax does not really affect PDVSA since
the increase in income tax is offset exactly by a reduction in net income.
Both tax and net income form part of the National Take, so it is simply
money which passes from one pocket to the other.
The proposed tax is not so complicated nor so punitive as many thought
it might be. This is because the tax rate on taxable income, currently
50%, has not been increased, and the new tax applies only to increased
sales income. The underlying principle is that income of up to $70 a barrel
is ordinary, but over that price it is extraordinary and caught in the
new tax net. It means the net profit on sales up to $70 a barrel remains
unchanged, and it is only the excess which is shared between the company
and the government. That is why, in my opinion, the new tax could have
been worse for the oil companies and the National Assembly has been reasonably
cautious in upping taxes.
The Government Take
in Venezuela was already one of the highest in the world, and the new
tax aggravates that situation. Following Colombia’s
recent oil discovery, a comment in the international press noted that, “Colombia’s
heavy oil potential is dwarfed by that of its neighbour Venezuela, which
is estimated to have at least 240bn barrels recoverable in its Orinoco
belt region. But Colombia has the great advantage of welcoming foreign
investment.”
This is only one writer’s
opinion, but Venezuela should be careful to avoid being seen as unfriendly
towards foreign investors. Measures,
such as unexpected tax hikes, may well scare off potential investors since
oil companies do not like the goal posts being moved once play has started.
I do not know how the new tax will be calculated as the government has
provided no examples. However, the following examples, based on a company
that sells 10,000 barrels a day, show one possibility:
Case 1. Average price $70 a barrel
Barrels sold
|
Sales Value
|
Income Tax
|
3,650,000 sold at $70
|
255,500,000
|
127.750,000
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
50.00%
|
Case 2. Average price $90 a barrel
Barrels sold
|
Sales Value
|
Income Tax
|
3,650,000 sold at $90
|
328.500.000
|
164.250.000
|
Less barrels at $70
|
255.500.000
|
.
|
Excess over $70
|
73.000.000
|
.
|
Income tax at 50%
|
.
|
36.500.000
|
Total income tax
|
.
|
200.750.000
|
Effective tax rate
|
.
|
61,11%
|
Case 3. Average price $100 a barrel
Barrels sold
|
Sales Value
|
Income Tax
|
3,650,000 sold at $90
|
365.000.000
|
182.500.000
|
Less barrels at $70
|
255.500.000
|
.
|
Excess over $70
|
110.000.000
|
.
|
Income tax at 50%
|
.
|
55.000.000
|
Total income tax
|
.
|
237.500.000
|
Effective tax rate
|
.
|
65,07%
|
The
effective tax rate above applies to sales only. The company’s
effective tax rate is another figure. It can be seen the effective tax
rate increases with the excess over $70 a barrel.
Oliver
L Campbell, MBA, DipM, FCCA, ACMA, MCIM was born in El Callao in
1931 where his father worked in the gold mining industry. He spent the
WWII years in
England, returning to Venezuela in 1953 to work with Shell de Venezuela
(CSV), later as Finance Coordinator at Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA).
In 1982 he returned to the UK with his family and retired early in 2002.
Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
Note: All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect
either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an
endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments
and
do not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are
posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments
on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 04/08/08
Copyright© 2008 respective author or news agency.
All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by
anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories
you have to
get authorization by its authors.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels